Skip to main content

In other news... (With correction about the Special Election)

 If you voted yesterday in the State primaries... you might have been surprised like me - I thought I would also be casting a vote for the Natick Select Board seat that sits open... 

But, because of laws beyond anyone's control - Natick has to hold another election next week for an uncontested race on Tuesday September 13th.  Voting information here.

I'm told that years ago Natick had to hold PRIMARIES because there were often so many people who wanted to run in the elections.  Sigh. I'm always grateful to anyone who will run and am happy to cast a vote next Tuesday - but I'd like to hope we have some contested races in March. 

photo credit: hitc.com

Correction: After publishing the blog, thanks to my readers, I learned that the above is incorrect:  

  • The Select Board, by town charter, can have a vacancy until the next election (March 2023), they may call for a special election themselves or be required to call for a special election if 200 people sign a petition calling for one. 
  • The special election could have happened on the same day as the state primary election but would have required separate ballots. 
  • Running 2 elections in 1 day would have required voters to check in once for the state election and a 2nd time at a 2nd table for the local election. 
  • In this memo from the Town Clerk to the select board, they received a recommendation that it would not be easy to run both elections on the same day. She explained her memo in the meeting on April 20th. 
  • See the discussion by the Select Board during the April 20th meeting here at minute 1:04 the Town Clerk explains that it is possible to run the elections at the same time and describes that there would need to be two check ins.  
  • She cautioned that the State primaries are partisan elections and our local elections are not and that the people who vote in that election tend to be vested in one party or the other.
  • Holding the special election with the November State election would put the election very close to the time to pick up papers for the March election and the Select board was concerned about the vacancy being open for so long.  
  • In the discussion, the consensus was to fill the vacancy sooner than later while avoiding the summer.
  • Additionally, early voting and vote by mail would need to be offered which increases the difficulty in terms of labor.  
  • There was a discussion about the difficulty of timing if a preliminary election being needed, in this case if 3 people entered the race. 
  • The Clerk estimated the cost of the a special election - in very rough numbers - between 40 and 50K assuming it was not held at the same time as another election. (around minute 1:15) Cost includes, poll workers, police detail, early voting, mail ins, ballot printing and programming our voting machines.  

The Board voted 4-0-0 to hold the election on Tuesday, September 13th. Minutes to the meeting are here.


And... what's going on with the South Natick Dam?  There's a meeting tonight! 5-7 p.m. 

Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend t...
Read more

Let’s Have a Vision for Elementary Schools.

Faced with some monumental school facility and space decisions, I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the quote that Dr. Nolin has below the signature line in her email:       The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on                building the new.     The emphasis in the quote is on what can come next. It is not about holding on tightly to what was, nor looking at an issue through only a technical, logistical lens but on moving forward with vision .  The administration, under advisement of the School Committee, is charged with setting that vision. The School Committee is charged with protecting that vision using the three roles within our domain - budget, policy and supervision of the Superintendent. All of us are working for the kids that are here today and those who will be here in the future.   Thankfully this time, as our School Committee grapp...
Read more

Vaccines

  The School Committee agenda for Monday, September 20th can be seen here .  (separate blog coming about the rest of the agenda...)  Mandates for student vaccinations for students participating in extracurricular activities, school and club sponsored events and athletics will be discussed and possibly voted on.   I have asked that the documents be linked asap so you can read it yourself but until then... The Quick Summary:  The draft policy is a mandate for students who are age-eligible through FDA approved vaccinations. In the case of a student who age eligible and is not vaccinated, a weekly PCR test is required. How many of our students are vaccinated? Department of Health (DPH) -   Vaccine tracker    - click on weekly municipal report to see chart below and compare. columns are: county, town, age range, # of people in that group, % that is that age, # of age group partially vaxed, proportion of full town partially vaxed, fully ...
Read more