Skip to main content

In other news... (With correction about the Special Election)

 If you voted yesterday in the State primaries... you might have been surprised like me - I thought I would also be casting a vote for the Natick Select Board seat that sits open... 

But, because of laws beyond anyone's control - Natick has to hold another election next week for an uncontested race on Tuesday September 13th.  Voting information here.

I'm told that years ago Natick had to hold PRIMARIES because there were often so many people who wanted to run in the elections.  Sigh. I'm always grateful to anyone who will run and am happy to cast a vote next Tuesday - but I'd like to hope we have some contested races in March. 

photo credit: hitc.com

Correction: After publishing the blog, thanks to my readers, I learned that the above is incorrect:  

  • The Select Board, by town charter, can have a vacancy until the next election (March 2023), they may call for a special election themselves or be required to call for a special election if 200 people sign a petition calling for one. 
  • The special election could have happened on the same day as the state primary election but would have required separate ballots. 
  • Running 2 elections in 1 day would have required voters to check in once for the state election and a 2nd time at a 2nd table for the local election. 
  • In this memo from the Town Clerk to the select board, they received a recommendation that it would not be easy to run both elections on the same day. She explained her memo in the meeting on April 20th. 
  • See the discussion by the Select Board during the April 20th meeting here at minute 1:04 the Town Clerk explains that it is possible to run the elections at the same time and describes that there would need to be two check ins.  
  • She cautioned that the State primaries are partisan elections and our local elections are not and that the people who vote in that election tend to be vested in one party or the other.
  • Holding the special election with the November State election would put the election very close to the time to pick up papers for the March election and the Select board was concerned about the vacancy being open for so long.  
  • In the discussion, the consensus was to fill the vacancy sooner than later while avoiding the summer.
  • Additionally, early voting and vote by mail would need to be offered which increases the difficulty in terms of labor.  
  • There was a discussion about the difficulty of timing if a preliminary election being needed, in this case if 3 people entered the race. 
  • The Clerk estimated the cost of the a special election - in very rough numbers - between 40 and 50K assuming it was not held at the same time as another election. (around minute 1:15) Cost includes, poll workers, police detail, early voting, mail ins, ballot printing and programming our voting machines.  

The Board voted 4-0-0 to hold the election on Tuesday, September 13th. Minutes to the meeting are here.


And... what's going on with the South Natick Dam?  There's a meeting tonight! 5-7 p.m. 

Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend t...
Read more

Evaluation Time

The School Committees of every community are charged with oversight for the budget, the policies and the evaluation of the superintendent for the districts they serve. Tonight, in Natick, we begin the Superintendent evaluation process.  Virtual Meeting Link - 6:00 p.m.    Background:  Page 2 of DESE Model system guide for Superintendent Evaluation These videos  and this PDF explain the 5 step Superintendent Evaluation Process that Natick is piloting with other communities. It was developed in partnership with Superintendents, School Committees and the Dept. of Ed.   While Natick has adjusted some of the evaluation to be in-line with the process outlined in the above resources, we are continuing to develop the full pilot program.  Also, for a point of reference and a reminder that every superintendent goes through a similar process,   here is a slide deck from one of the initial meetings for the City of Boston's Superintendent evaluatio...
Read more

Quick Summary of Key things for the Natick School Committee this week

  Quick Links for current items: Natick School Committee begins Coffee Hours - Take a moment to speak to one of your elected officials about the district’s strategic plan in the coming months!   Policy Questions?  Click here to see the Natick School Committee Policy Manual .  Every year it is accepted by the Natick School Committee as our guiding principles for our work. It sets expectations for communication, procedures and processes for most everything related to our schools.  While specific policies are updated every year, the last major revision/ reconsideration of policies was in the early 2000’s.   One goal of the current policy subcommittee is to begin to look at each section of our policy manual once a year for a more sustainable updating of these key policies.   Policy Subcommittee’s next meeting is Thursday, Feb 17th from 1- 3 p.m. on the 3rd floor of the Natick Town Hall.   Budget Season! Not a financial person? Rea...
Read more