Skip to main content

"No one really does anything alone."

 In what I believe is an unprecedented amount of time, Spring Town Meeting finished on Tuesday night!  

Thank you to Dani Newland, Town Meeting Member Precinct 8, for taking these notes for those who would like to read about what happened.  Link to the warrant (agenda) of the meeting.  For those who want to watch the meetings. Watch it on Pegasus here!  (THANK YOU PEGASUS!) 

Articles Of Note:

  • Money was appropriated for the collective bargaining units on the town side.
  • The sale of Town owned land near Scrub A Dub passed
  • A series of zoning changes 
    • time to rewrite a by law on cluster developments - accepted
    • changes in the Golden Triangle region to bring consistency - accepted
    • changes to language when calculating open space - referred back to the planning board
    • reappropriate money to do trail improvements at Pickerel Pond - accepted
  • Town Meeting Rules committee - handbook created and accepted
  • Article 29 was recommended indefinite postponement by the Fin Com, moved No Action at the meeting - accepted
Image of Pickerel Pond in Natick


The night was bookended with the recognition of three long standing Town Meeting Members.


At the start of the meeting, the body passed a resolution thanking Sue Salamoff (minute 6:25) for 50 years of service to the Town! It's a beautiful read and I hope it will inspire more people to get involved! 


At the end, the body then heard passionate words (minute 2:17) from Ericka Ball thanking Town Meeting for the time she and Jay, her husband, have shared in this "wonderful expression of democracy." She encouraged the body "Please continue to build the town to its full potential after Jay and I are no longer part of TM."


Ms. Salamoff also shared deep words of thanks and reminding us that we have an amazing town:

 "No one really does anything alone." 


Mr. Sidney motioned for adjournment and the meeting was soon dissolved. Well done, Mr. Moderator, you ushered Town Meeting through with speed!

Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend the future rebuilt s

Questions that I am asking or have received...

Serving in this role, I hold a seat that gives me the ability to ask my questions and yours to our administration with the hope that the questions reinforce our strategic goals. I've long relied on the value that, "two heads are better than one."  So here are some of the questions that the School Committee has been asked this week by parents and constituents: Cameron Middle School in Framingham 1) Will outdoor structures be used in the fall to allow for outdoor mask breaks when the weather is poor or lunch in a safer setting?   While this falls into an operational issue at the school and is not typically in the purview of the School Committee, because of COVID we have an  interim COVID policy  (page 120) where it is stated that the school committee establishes an emergency, interim policy to promote public safety and safety of students and faculty.   Perhaps one example of the use of the application of this policy could be seen in the March 15th School Committee meeting  

In other news... (With correction about the Special Election)

 If you voted yesterday in the State primaries... you might have been surprised like me - I thought I would also be casting a vote for the Natick Select Board seat that sits open...  But, because of laws beyond anyone's control - Natick has to hold another election next week for an uncontested race on Tuesday September 13th.  Voting information here. I'm told that years ago Natick had to hold PRIMARIES because there were often so many people who wanted to run in the elections.  Sigh. I'm always grateful to anyone who will run and am happy to cast a vote next Tuesday - but I'd like to hope we have some contested races in March.  Correction: After publishing the blog, thanks to my readers, I learned that the above is incorrect:   The Select Board, by town charter,  can have a vacancy until the next election (March 2023), they may call for a special election themselves or be required to call for a special election if 200 people sign a petition calling for one.  The speci