Skip to main content

Getting the Job Done Well

Monday, May 2nd - School Committee Meeting 

 Find all of the materials here

There was a theme that ran through 3 aspects of our meeting last night... (and maybe all over our meetings) 

How do we get the job done well? 

In the Facilities presentation, we learned that we are severely under staffed in custodial and maintenance based on industry standards. Mr. Spratt, our facilities director, advised that we take a long term approach to the remedy:

First operationalize efficiencies, then add staff once the systems are improved.


The additional staff will eventually come out of the Natick Town budget in Shared Expenses by the Schools and the Town. As one member noted last night, the need for staff begins to demonstrate the need to increase the our Town Budgets in the coming years. As you know, as a whole, our Town and School budgets are running a deficit every year. We can't go into the red by state law so we continue paying bills with savings and other one time funds like free cash.  We can't have both an structural deficit AND a need for more staff without eventually realizing an Operational Override... 

That said, I have to highlight the facilities department's commitment to change some of the operational aspects in order to FIRST create efficiencies and THEN request the staff needed.  I appreciate this as a tax payer and as someone who first got involved in town politics because of a budget crisis.  

The Strategic Plan 

was also discussed last night.  Our current plan is ending at the end of the next school year.  

In this Memo to the Committee, Dr. Nolin advised the committee we need to tackle this effort as an internal effort or with an outside consultant. 

The committee discussed several pro's and con's to both paths with most of the members indicating that they are leaning towards keeping this as an internal process. 

I'll be honest, I am frustrated by one reason I have heard to use an internal approach:  that we don't have enough time or money to work with consultant. Overall, I am not entirely against an internal approach (with a well defined design plan) but that reasoning falls short on me. 

In fact, I believe the opposite (not that we have unlimited funds) but this critical piece of our leadership is one of the MOST IMPORTANT places to invest both time and resources so that we have the MOST robust picture of our district and the MOST realistic and innovative plan to influence how we go to through the next 5 years. 

So, over the next days, I will be speaking to constituents about this and reaching out to other districts to understand how and why they chose the process they did (internal or external). Also, what type of design worked well and role the School Committee played in the district plan's creation.

Our committee also has an outstanding question:  If we created a Strategic Plan Subcommittee (sub committees as an agenda item for our May 23rd Committee Retreat Meeting), how many members can be on it and what will their role be? Additionally, it was asked if other members of the community and school staff could serve on the committee.  

The School Committee will vote on doing the Strategic plan internally or with an external consultant on May 16th.

Teaching and Learning 

Finally, the Director of Teaching and Learning, Ms. Sue Balboni, presented her Entry Plan - The School Committee has no action on this plan, but listened to understand the perspective Ms. Balboni will take into her work in the coming years.  

After offering interviews to anyone in the community, and completing these interviews:

Ms. Balboni shared these observations on the work ahead:  





 Thanks always for reading.  



Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend t...

Evaluation Time

The School Committees of every community are charged with oversight for the budget, the policies and the evaluation of the superintendent for the districts they serve. Tonight, in Natick, we begin the Superintendent evaluation process.  Virtual Meeting Link - 6:00 p.m.    Background:  Page 2 of DESE Model system guide for Superintendent Evaluation These videos  and this PDF explain the 5 step Superintendent Evaluation Process that Natick is piloting with other communities. It was developed in partnership with Superintendents, School Committees and the Dept. of Ed.   While Natick has adjusted some of the evaluation to be in-line with the process outlined in the above resources, we are continuing to develop the full pilot program.  Also, for a point of reference and a reminder that every superintendent goes through a similar process,   here is a slide deck from one of the initial meetings for the City of Boston's Superintendent evaluatio...

Quick Summary of Key things for the Natick School Committee this week

  Quick Links for current items: Natick School Committee begins Coffee Hours - Take a moment to speak to one of your elected officials about the district’s strategic plan in the coming months!   Policy Questions?  Click here to see the Natick School Committee Policy Manual .  Every year it is accepted by the Natick School Committee as our guiding principles for our work. It sets expectations for communication, procedures and processes for most everything related to our schools.  While specific policies are updated every year, the last major revision/ reconsideration of policies was in the early 2000’s.   One goal of the current policy subcommittee is to begin to look at each section of our policy manual once a year for a more sustainable updating of these key policies.   Policy Subcommittee’s next meeting is Thursday, Feb 17th from 1- 3 p.m. on the 3rd floor of the Natick Town Hall.   Budget Season! Not a financial person? Rea...