Skip to main content

We Can Do Hard Things

The State Ethics Commission was unable to give me a ruling on Monday because the lawyer who made the ruling had an unforeseen family circumstance that kept him from the office. When I learned of that, I asked our committee to delay.  

Please note, that I am still expecting a clarification ruling from the State Ethics Commission. I will admit, at one point in this process I didn’t want the clarification because I was tired. I do have big girl pants and I have put them on for the last 7 months every time someone has tried to make this experience personal instead about ideas. Still, as anyone would, I have my limits on what I can take and this recusal put me there.


Mentors and people I deeply respect then asked me to pursue a clarification because it had ramifications - perhaps even statewide - that could be really damaging to our political process. I agreed if I could do it with SUPPORT from the town instead of the POLITICS of those who wanted the ruling reversed, I would pursue it. 


(Politics: There was an argument made that I had caused the ruling b/c of the way I framed the decision to the SEC AND that the ruling needed to be reversed NOT with the motivation of restoring my vote, but because the ruling that my house value would be impacted weakened the argument that the Schools had done enough research. I shared this exact thought with my chair so that I could be clear about my motivations when I pursued a clarification - I was doing it b/c I do not want future votes to be compromised because of 19b3.)


The Chair asked the committee to delay this week and two members could not do the new dates because of personal reasons. The other option was the Monday of Thanksgiving week. When this option was put forth, I called two members - asking as a parent and community member - if they had made their decision. Both had. 


This School Committee had one of the most difficult decisions a board will ever make before them. In my family, when faced with a challenge, we rely on this value statement: “We Can Do Hard Things.” 


And, I teach my kids that we can do hard things:

  • Without blaming or lashing out on others because what we are doing is hard 

  • Without a notion of entitlement that we “shouldn’t have to do this.” 

  • Without giving up emotionally, spiritually or physically


Now, as a parent and community member, I absolutely disagree with the committee’s decision. I also disagree that none of the members seconded Ms. Sonnenborn’s amendment to create a time bound closure contingent upon acceptance into the MSBA. Had they done that, we could have waited to see what enrollment looks like over the next 5 years and at that point we could have made a deliberate decision to stay at 5 schools or move to 4. Instead, the order the votes were taken about a building that needed to close, has far reaching implications about the total number of kids at each school. I truly hope that my opinion is wrong and that we see the benefits that have been listed around consolidating - that we can compensate our teachers well because of it, that we can still expand programs that have long been desired in a cost containment model, that ASAP will not be limited and that we work hard to bring the best parts of Johnson at the other schools. 


***


Moreover, after all this, I sincerely hope, we do not land back exactly at where the recusals started. Now is not the time to threaten each other or intimidate one another for having different opinions. Now is the time, Johnson parent or not, to mourn that our town was not able to resuscitate a cherished piece of our town’s history. Decades of decisions led to Monday’s vote and the most important thing we need to do is reflect on that and ask ourselves, how do we move FAR, FAR from what created a nearly impossible situation. If we do not, people we will never meet might have to have the same conversation about other beloved things in our town in 100 years and wonder why this generation of citizens left them with such bad luck.


Right now I am mourning, but I am also reflecting. If the Johnson school is to have one last impact on our whole town - it is to convince us that: 


We can do hard and strategic, and thoughtful things that will have important impacts: 

  • We can get more people to run for every elected position.

  • We can hire and then empower professionals by interacting with excellent communication and checks and balances that are a tool (not a punishment) that allow us to focus collectively on measurable goals.

  • We can make changes to our charter to allow the positions to be more desirable 

    • shorter term limits for some positions, 

    • stipends for “volunteer positions” that take 40 hours a week

    • changes to the budget cycle that put people and administration regularly at odds.

  • We can make changes to our Town Government that take a system that was built for farmers in the fiefdoms of England and adjust it to our experience now.  

  • We can hold one another accountable (without defensiveness) in order to better the lives of our children and the residents of Natick. 


Above all, we can expect that our elected officials do the hard work of clearly defining their roles and responsibilities and choosing every time to act within those guidelines. 


Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend the future rebuilt s

Questions that I am asking or have received...

Serving in this role, I hold a seat that gives me the ability to ask my questions and yours to our administration with the hope that the questions reinforce our strategic goals. I've long relied on the value that, "two heads are better than one."  So here are some of the questions that the School Committee has been asked this week by parents and constituents: Cameron Middle School in Framingham 1) Will outdoor structures be used in the fall to allow for outdoor mask breaks when the weather is poor or lunch in a safer setting?   While this falls into an operational issue at the school and is not typically in the purview of the School Committee, because of COVID we have an  interim COVID policy  (page 120) where it is stated that the school committee establishes an emergency, interim policy to promote public safety and safety of students and faculty.   Perhaps one example of the use of the application of this policy could be seen in the March 15th School Committee meeting  

In other news... (With correction about the Special Election)

 If you voted yesterday in the State primaries... you might have been surprised like me - I thought I would also be casting a vote for the Natick Select Board seat that sits open...  But, because of laws beyond anyone's control - Natick has to hold another election next week for an uncontested race on Tuesday September 13th.  Voting information here. I'm told that years ago Natick had to hold PRIMARIES because there were often so many people who wanted to run in the elections.  Sigh. I'm always grateful to anyone who will run and am happy to cast a vote next Tuesday - but I'd like to hope we have some contested races in March.  Correction: After publishing the blog, thanks to my readers, I learned that the above is incorrect:   The Select Board, by town charter,  can have a vacancy until the next election (March 2023), they may call for a special election themselves or be required to call for a special election if 200 people sign a petition calling for one.  The speci