Skip to main content

State Ethics Commission's Ruling

 Date: Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:30 AM

Subject: Your Inquiry
To: Brunell, Catherine <cbrunell@natickps.org>

 

Ms. Brunell,

 

Per your request, I am writing to confirm the advice that I provided you over the phone regarding the conflict of interest law, G.L. c. 268A. 

 

You are a member of the Natick School Committee.  You advised that the School Committee is engaged in a comprehensive open space discussion.  One of the items coming before the School Committee in this regard involves the potential closure of the Johnson Elementary School.  The Johnson Elementary School is 0.3 miles from your house, and you have two children who are currently enrolled in the school.  The matter of the Johnson Elementary School appears to be intertwined for purposes of discussion and vote with the matter of the Memorial Elementary School.  For clarity, I will refer to these jointly as the Elementary School matters.  The School Committee is having a separate discussion and vote on High School matters. 

 

You inquired as to how the conflict of interest law would apply to you given the above facts. 

 

As we discussed, Section 19 of the conflict of interest law prohibits you from participating as a School Committee member in any particular matter in which you have a financial interest.  You have a presumed financial interest in the Elementary School matters given the proximity of your property to the Johnson Elementary School.  As such, you must recuse yourself from the Elementary School matters, including from any discussion and vote (and from acting on any emails sent to you as a School Committee member in this regard).  As a best practice, you should make a statement for the minutes stating that you are recusing yourself, and then leave the room while the matter is being addressed.  You may however speak from the audience as a member of the public as long as you do so only in your private capacity and only on behalf of yourself.  Note that, because the High School matters have been separated from the Elementary School matters, you may participate in the High School matters.  Additionally, if you obtain an independent real estate appraisal that concludes that the closure of the Johnson Elementary School would have no impact on your financial interests (e.g., would not affect the value of your property), then you may participate in the Elementary School matters as long as you have no other financial interest in the matter and file a Section 23(b)(3) disclosure with the Town Clerk.  If you obtain such an appraisal, you should contact me for further advice regarding whether you may have a financial interest given two of your children are enrolled in the Johnson Elementary School. 

 

I hope this advice has been helpful.  Let me know if you have any questions about this advice. 


                                     

                                     

State Ethics Commission

One Ashburton Place, Room 619

Boston, MA  02108





Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend t...
Read more

Natick's Strategic Plan

Over the next several meetings the School Committee will focus much of its time on the progress being made in our district goals. For example, tonight  Goal #2 will be discussed.   These goals are an essential anchor for my work on this board with the hope that they always reflect deep listening to our students & families and our professionals.   As we go through these goals, I am looking for the SMARRT objective under each of the 4 main goals and interested in how a district adapts a 5 year plan in the middle of the course. As a new member, I have some basic questions to understand the document and how to best serve it:  Who helped take the plan from yearly district goals to our multi-year  strategic plan ? What's the process like to form these goals? What is the process like to evaluate them? Has the change from yearly goals to a multi-year strategic plan helped us be more prepared financially for things coming down the line?  What is the proces...
Read more

Community Forums Change

Date change ... Community Forum from tonight, Monday October 25th to next week, Monday, November 1st. (explained below.)  What is all the hub bub? Space needs at the High School Pre-school programs movement Future of Johnson Elementary Long term planning for Memorial Elementary renovations/rebuild If I haven't read anything or need information what should I read?    Taken From the Natick Engage email this week:   I (Dr. Nolin) advise reading the in depth report on  Facilities, Space and Capital Planning , or, if you have less time, this  Executive Summary . Discussions will occur on 10/18, 11/1, 11/15 at a minimum. ***** Quick links to items that you can find in the above documents:  Link to FACILITIES DEPARTMENT STEWARDSHIP REPORT  presented to School Committee on 10/18. Chart Overviewing the Findings/Analysis of the TA’s Advisory Committee (Spring 2021)   (of which I was a part this summer)  Town of Natick Space Report (2012...
Read more