Skip to main content

State Ethics Commission's Ruling

 Date: Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:30 AM

Subject: Your Inquiry
To: Brunell, Catherine <cbrunell@natickps.org>

 

Ms. Brunell,

 

Per your request, I am writing to confirm the advice that I provided you over the phone regarding the conflict of interest law, G.L. c. 268A. 

 

You are a member of the Natick School Committee.  You advised that the School Committee is engaged in a comprehensive open space discussion.  One of the items coming before the School Committee in this regard involves the potential closure of the Johnson Elementary School.  The Johnson Elementary School is 0.3 miles from your house, and you have two children who are currently enrolled in the school.  The matter of the Johnson Elementary School appears to be intertwined for purposes of discussion and vote with the matter of the Memorial Elementary School.  For clarity, I will refer to these jointly as the Elementary School matters.  The School Committee is having a separate discussion and vote on High School matters. 

 

You inquired as to how the conflict of interest law would apply to you given the above facts. 

 

As we discussed, Section 19 of the conflict of interest law prohibits you from participating as a School Committee member in any particular matter in which you have a financial interest.  You have a presumed financial interest in the Elementary School matters given the proximity of your property to the Johnson Elementary School.  As such, you must recuse yourself from the Elementary School matters, including from any discussion and vote (and from acting on any emails sent to you as a School Committee member in this regard).  As a best practice, you should make a statement for the minutes stating that you are recusing yourself, and then leave the room while the matter is being addressed.  You may however speak from the audience as a member of the public as long as you do so only in your private capacity and only on behalf of yourself.  Note that, because the High School matters have been separated from the Elementary School matters, you may participate in the High School matters.  Additionally, if you obtain an independent real estate appraisal that concludes that the closure of the Johnson Elementary School would have no impact on your financial interests (e.g., would not affect the value of your property), then you may participate in the Elementary School matters as long as you have no other financial interest in the matter and file a Section 23(b)(3) disclosure with the Town Clerk.  If you obtain such an appraisal, you should contact me for further advice regarding whether you may have a financial interest given two of your children are enrolled in the Johnson Elementary School. 

 

I hope this advice has been helpful.  Let me know if you have any questions about this advice. 


                                     

                                     

State Ethics Commission

One Ashburton Place, Room 619

Boston, MA  02108





Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend t...

Let’s Have a Vision for Elementary Schools.

Faced with some monumental school facility and space decisions, I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the quote that Dr. Nolin has below the signature line in her email:       The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on                building the new.     The emphasis in the quote is on what can come next. It is not about holding on tightly to what was, nor looking at an issue through only a technical, logistical lens but on moving forward with vision .  The administration, under advisement of the School Committee, is charged with setting that vision. The School Committee is charged with protecting that vision using the three roles within our domain - budget, policy and supervision of the Superintendent. All of us are working for the kids that are here today and those who will be here in the future.   Thankfully this time, as our School Committee grapp...

Vaccines

  The School Committee agenda for Monday, September 20th can be seen here .  (separate blog coming about the rest of the agenda...)  Mandates for student vaccinations for students participating in extracurricular activities, school and club sponsored events and athletics will be discussed and possibly voted on.   I have asked that the documents be linked asap so you can read it yourself but until then... The Quick Summary:  The draft policy is a mandate for students who are age-eligible through FDA approved vaccinations. In the case of a student who age eligible and is not vaccinated, a weekly PCR test is required. How many of our students are vaccinated? Department of Health (DPH) -   Vaccine tracker    - click on weekly municipal report to see chart below and compare. columns are: county, town, age range, # of people in that group, % that is that age, # of age group partially vaxed, proportion of full town partially vaxed, fully ...