Skip to main content

Dialogue and Outcome - thoughts on critical race theory, Diversity, Equity an Inclusion in 01760

 Critical Race Theory (CRT) and how it applies to k-12 schools in Massachusetts promises to be a topic that School Committees will hear about in the coming year. 

I’d like to take a moment to give it some attention here and to invite any of you reading this blog to communicate with me about CRT, Equity Education and all things that involve Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.  As you know, I am on the Policy sub-committee with members Dr. Mackenzie, Ms. Collins and Superintendent, Dr. Nolin. Our meetings were cancelled this summer but our work continues as individuals because in the coming year we will suggest policies to the full committee that will better reflect the values of our school district around race, diversity, equity and inclusion. Those policies will be better if our community is involved so please be in touch!  cbrunell@natickps.org 

Additionally, Massachusetts School Committee Association put out this cheat sheet on CRT and Equity Education and has invited School Committee members to learn more.   

As someone who taught in schools that were majority non-white, issues of race and education were central to my formation as an educator. Now, living in Natick, I often wonder about the experiences my kids (and all of our kids – those who are white and those who are from the racially and ethnic minority groups) are having. How does it compare to the students’ experiences that I taught in Chicago and Boston? How has the experience nationally and locally changed or stayed the same in past decade? Where is the opportunity and where is our responsibility, as a district, as a committee and as a community? 

Can we have these conversations – sometimes healing and uncomfortable and hopefully always dynamic – and can we respect each other even where we might disagree? 

During the Superintendent Evaluation meetings last week (eval document still in draft form – and will be presented at the end of July and voted on in August) our committee was able to reflect on some very concrete actions our district took this year, for example the training of administrators around hiring practices to increase racially diverse candidate pools, all staff professional development that was run on defining and giving tools around preventing microaggressions in a school, and a draft of a culturally sensitive homework calendar.  

I also regularly look to other districts to see where they are thriving. This is not to say that any of the below examples are cookie cutter perfect for Natick. They are, however, examples of communities who have taken the time, resources and lots of courage to think about how they define the concepts, how to set measurable goals using them and what the definitions and goals are leading the districts in the coming years. If you click on the links below, you will see work that was completed after 100’s of hours of meetings of committees and working groups that involved all walks of life in these communities.  I share it because as the heat gets turned up on things like CRT, I truly hope Natick can be a place of dialogue and outcomes.

Dover- Sherborn

Acton -Boxboro

Framingham

I’m grateful to be part of the conversation as a school committee member, grateful for those who have been working on it in our schools and community for decades and hopeful for what is to come because it’s a journey for sure! Thanks, always, for reading and communicating with me.

Coming next… thoughts on my first few months as a School Committee Member ….

Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend t...

Vaccines

  The School Committee agenda for Monday, September 20th can be seen here .  (separate blog coming about the rest of the agenda...)  Mandates for student vaccinations for students participating in extracurricular activities, school and club sponsored events and athletics will be discussed and possibly voted on.   I have asked that the documents be linked asap so you can read it yourself but until then... The Quick Summary:  The draft policy is a mandate for students who are age-eligible through FDA approved vaccinations. In the case of a student who age eligible and is not vaccinated, a weekly PCR test is required. How many of our students are vaccinated? Department of Health (DPH) -   Vaccine tracker    - click on weekly municipal report to see chart below and compare. columns are: county, town, age range, # of people in that group, % that is that age, # of age group partially vaxed, proportion of full town partially vaxed, fully ...

Natick's Strategic Plan

Over the next several meetings the School Committee will focus much of its time on the progress being made in our district goals. For example, tonight  Goal #2 will be discussed.   These goals are an essential anchor for my work on this board with the hope that they always reflect deep listening to our students & families and our professionals.   As we go through these goals, I am looking for the SMARRT objective under each of the 4 main goals and interested in how a district adapts a 5 year plan in the middle of the course. As a new member, I have some basic questions to understand the document and how to best serve it:  Who helped take the plan from yearly district goals to our multi-year  strategic plan ? What's the process like to form these goals? What is the process like to evaluate them? Has the change from yearly goals to a multi-year strategic plan helped us be more prepared financially for things coming down the line?  What is the proces...