Skip to main content

Results of Covid Recovery Discussion

During my School Committee training, it was recommended to go into a vote with an open mind and to make the decision in the meeting. So surprise - even to me ... I voted yes on the COVID Recovery Memo. (7-0-0 passage). 

I asked questions and I heard the things that I needed to hear the administration say about the use of the funds. Link to Pegasus - June 14th video.

Current COVID Recovery Plan - includes monies rolled over from FY21 and ESSERS


(see tab 2 on this sheet.)   

Full disclosure, I apologized to Mr. Luff, Assistant Superintendent of Student Services, after the meeting for observing that it was difficult to know what the actual positions suggested were... in real time, I learned that they were both in a 2nd tab put into the spreadsheet (above) and in a memo he created and was imbedded in the slides. I missed the link!

Also, parents/families requested in this meeting, and in letters to our committee, that the district develop a thorough and timely funding strategy to respond to the needs that our literacy audit illuminates and that the Department of Ed's guidelines around dyslexia have set forth. At this point, the administration has determined that one time funds are not the place to address the long term solutions that are needed in this area. Thus, the work begins to integrate the necessary changes within literacy into the Natick Public Schools budget in the future. 

I heard these things during the meeting: 

1) The positions (see above) are temporary - for one year.

2) The Administration is going to produce a document to indicate any positions that are recommended to remain beyond this funding source so that our committee and community can understand the impact on the FY23 budget or any future budgets when the grant has expired or been fully spent. (We have until 2024 to spend the ESSERS III money (about $1.1mm). 

3) The administration expects that these plans may shift in the coming months and even years. When there is a change, the School's leadership team will bring it back to the committee.

4) Natick's ESSERS III implementation plan will be posted and public comment about the proposed spending will be collected. Stakeholders, like families within the district, will have a chance to give feedback.

5) If that feedback shows public desires for different prioritizations of these funds, adjustments will be made. Further, the Superintendent is confident that we are following the grant's guidelines by seeking public comment at that point in the process. (Before I heard this, I was hesitant to vote something that happened without "robust stakeholder engagement as is described in the grant.) 

6) As a town, we are slatted to receive an additional $10mm in federal funds. The School Administration is working with the Town Administration to understand if some of those funds will come to the schools.

 (Click here to open the slide.)

Happy Last Week of School!  As always, reach out if you have any thoughts to share!  


Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend t...

Let’s Have a Vision for Elementary Schools.

Faced with some monumental school facility and space decisions, I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the quote that Dr. Nolin has below the signature line in her email:       The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on                building the new.     The emphasis in the quote is on what can come next. It is not about holding on tightly to what was, nor looking at an issue through only a technical, logistical lens but on moving forward with vision .  The administration, under advisement of the School Committee, is charged with setting that vision. The School Committee is charged with protecting that vision using the three roles within our domain - budget, policy and supervision of the Superintendent. All of us are working for the kids that are here today and those who will be here in the future.   Thankfully this time, as our School Committee grapp...

Vaccines

  The School Committee agenda for Monday, September 20th can be seen here .  (separate blog coming about the rest of the agenda...)  Mandates for student vaccinations for students participating in extracurricular activities, school and club sponsored events and athletics will be discussed and possibly voted on.   I have asked that the documents be linked asap so you can read it yourself but until then... The Quick Summary:  The draft policy is a mandate for students who are age-eligible through FDA approved vaccinations. In the case of a student who age eligible and is not vaccinated, a weekly PCR test is required. How many of our students are vaccinated? Department of Health (DPH) -   Vaccine tracker    - click on weekly municipal report to see chart below and compare. columns are: county, town, age range, # of people in that group, % that is that age, # of age group partially vaxed, proportion of full town partially vaxed, fully ...