Skip to main content

Results of Covid Recovery Discussion

During my School Committee training, it was recommended to go into a vote with an open mind and to make the decision in the meeting. So surprise - even to me ... I voted yes on the COVID Recovery Memo. (7-0-0 passage). 

I asked questions and I heard the things that I needed to hear the administration say about the use of the funds. Link to Pegasus - June 14th video.

Current COVID Recovery Plan - includes monies rolled over from FY21 and ESSERS


(see tab 2 on this sheet.)   

Full disclosure, I apologized to Mr. Luff, Assistant Superintendent of Student Services, after the meeting for observing that it was difficult to know what the actual positions suggested were... in real time, I learned that they were both in a 2nd tab put into the spreadsheet (above) and in a memo he created and was imbedded in the slides. I missed the link!

Also, parents/families requested in this meeting, and in letters to our committee, that the district develop a thorough and timely funding strategy to respond to the needs that our literacy audit illuminates and that the Department of Ed's guidelines around dyslexia have set forth. At this point, the administration has determined that one time funds are not the place to address the long term solutions that are needed in this area. Thus, the work begins to integrate the necessary changes within literacy into the Natick Public Schools budget in the future. 

I heard these things during the meeting: 

1) The positions (see above) are temporary - for one year.

2) The Administration is going to produce a document to indicate any positions that are recommended to remain beyond this funding source so that our committee and community can understand the impact on the FY23 budget or any future budgets when the grant has expired or been fully spent. (We have until 2024 to spend the ESSERS III money (about $1.1mm). 

3) The administration expects that these plans may shift in the coming months and even years. When there is a change, the School's leadership team will bring it back to the committee.

4) Natick's ESSERS III implementation plan will be posted and public comment about the proposed spending will be collected. Stakeholders, like families within the district, will have a chance to give feedback.

5) If that feedback shows public desires for different prioritizations of these funds, adjustments will be made. Further, the Superintendent is confident that we are following the grant's guidelines by seeking public comment at that point in the process. (Before I heard this, I was hesitant to vote something that happened without "robust stakeholder engagement as is described in the grant.) 

6) As a town, we are slatted to receive an additional $10mm in federal funds. The School Administration is working with the Town Administration to understand if some of those funds will come to the schools.

 (Click here to open the slide.)

Happy Last Week of School!  As always, reach out if you have any thoughts to share!  


Popular posts from this blog

Statement on Recusal

Here are the remarks I gave last night when letting my committee know my decision to recuse:  After the School Committee meeting on October 15th, several individuals wrote into the SpeakUp Natick portal requesting that I recuse myself from voting on the possible closure of Johnson.  The substance of these messages, sent to the full committee, carried a familiar refrain. The messages - often using the same language – said some version of the following:  Catherine Brunell should recuse herself from deliberating and voting on the closure of Johnson because she lacks objectivity, as her children go to school there and she is from that neighborhood. I asked myself the question if there was any merit to the request for me to recuse myself and started to do some research about why people recuse  From what I can tell from the minutes, in Natick, It’s never happened before - not with the Kennedy, Wilson or the High School - not even for members whose children were to attend the future rebuilt s

Community Forums Change

Date change ... Community Forum from tonight, Monday October 25th to next week, Monday, November 1st. (explained below.)  What is all the hub bub? Space needs at the High School Pre-school programs movement Future of Johnson Elementary Long term planning for Memorial Elementary renovations/rebuild If I haven't read anything or need information what should I read?    Taken From the Natick Engage email this week:   I (Dr. Nolin) advise reading the in depth report on  Facilities, Space and Capital Planning , or, if you have less time, this  Executive Summary . Discussions will occur on 10/18, 11/1, 11/15 at a minimum. ***** Quick links to items that you can find in the above documents:  Link to FACILITIES DEPARTMENT STEWARDSHIP REPORT  presented to School Committee on 10/18. Chart Overviewing the Findings/Analysis of the TA’s Advisory Committee (Spring 2021)   (of which I was a part this summer)  Town of Natick Space Report (2012) (Dorr and Whittier) ***** Links to Videos on Pegasus

In other news... (With correction about the Special Election)

 If you voted yesterday in the State primaries... you might have been surprised like me - I thought I would also be casting a vote for the Natick Select Board seat that sits open...  But, because of laws beyond anyone's control - Natick has to hold another election next week for an uncontested race on Tuesday September 13th.  Voting information here. I'm told that years ago Natick had to hold PRIMARIES because there were often so many people who wanted to run in the elections.  Sigh. I'm always grateful to anyone who will run and am happy to cast a vote next Tuesday - but I'd like to hope we have some contested races in March.  Correction: After publishing the blog, thanks to my readers, I learned that the above is incorrect:   The Select Board, by town charter,  can have a vacancy until the next election (March 2023), they may call for a special election themselves or be required to call for a special election if 200 people sign a petition calling for one.  The speci